Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. CHARLES SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. CHARLES SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 190300 | LA | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $82K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$82K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$943K
Risk-Adjusted
-$649K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$605K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$599K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$368K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$605K$605K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$583K$17K$599K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$275K$368K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$151K$303K$454K$605K$605K$605K$605K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$150K$300K$449K$599K$599K$599K$599K
A/R Days Reduction$0$123K$246K$368K$368K$368K$368K$368K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$434K$867K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x171% / 147.3x177% / 164.1x183% / 180.8x185% / 189.2x188% / 197.6x
9.0x165% / 130.6x171% / 145.5x176% / 160.4x179% / 167.8x181% / 175.2x
10.0x159% / 117.2x165% / 130.6x170% / 144.0x173% / 150.7x175% / 157.4x
11.0x154% / 106.3x160% / 118.5x165% / 130.6x167% / 136.7x170% / 142.8x
12.0x150% / 97.2x155% / 108.3x160% / 119.5x163% / 125.0x165% / 130.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.1x
Headroom (turns)
94%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 94% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.4x, adding 8.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$82K$82K0.3%
Year 1$84K+$1.1M$1.1M3.8%
Year 2$87K+$1.6M$1.7M5.5%
Year 3$90K+$1.6M$1.7M5.6%
Year 4$92K+$1.6M$1.7M5.6%
Year 5$95K+$1.6M$1.7M5.6%
$819K
Entry EV (10x)
$18.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.7M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$130K
Organic Growth
$15.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$303K$454K$605K$726K
Denial Rate Reductio$300K$449K$599K$719K
A/R Days Reduction$184K$276K$368K$442K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$796K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.3%-21.2%-3.8%4.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross17.3%31.5%42.0%56.1%
P5
Occupancy12.8%21.3%46.5%65.1%
P10
Rev/Bed$776K$273K$435K$868K
P72
Exp/Bed$774K$261K$442K$965K
P63

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML