Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVALA 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVALA
CCN 190267 | LA | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $8.1M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$64.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$778K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$41K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$196K$582K$778K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$41K$41K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$320K$640K$960K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$317K$633K$950K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$259K$519K$778K$778K$778K$778K$778K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Cumulative$0$917K$1.8M$2.7M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M7.4%
Year 1$4.9M+$2.2M$7.1M11.1%
Year 2$5.0M+$3.4M$8.4M13.1%
Year 3$5.2M+$3.4M$8.6M13.4%
Year 4$5.3M+$3.4M$8.7M13.6%
Year 5$5.5M+$3.4M$8.9M13.9%
$47.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$97.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.1M
Value Created
$8.9M
Exit EBITDA
$7.6M
Organic Growth
$33.7M
RCM Value Creation
$8.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$640K$960K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$633K$950K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$389K$584K$778K$934K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$31K$41K$49K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 122 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.4%-14.8%-2.1%6.6%
P77
Net-to-Gross16.9%33.7%46.2%60.5%
P3
Occupancy23.3%21.1%46.4%69.9%
P29
Rev/Bed$3.0M$288K$466K$885K
P97
Exp/Bed$2.8M$272K$468K$963K
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML