Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE AREA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 190201 | LA | 88 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $6.1M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$81.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$992K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$250K$742K$992K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$408K$816K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$404K$807K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$331K$662K$992K$992K$992K$992K$992K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.6x98% / 30.1x99% / 31.5x
9.0x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.5x90% / 25.1x92% / 26.4x94% / 27.7x
10.0x77% / 17.6x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.4x90% / 24.6x
11.0x73% / 15.7x78% / 17.8x82% / 19.9x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.0x
12.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 19.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M2.2%
Year 1$1.8M+$2.9M$4.7M5.8%
Year 2$1.9M+$4.3M$6.2M7.6%
Year 3$1.9M+$4.3M$6.2M7.6%
Year 4$2.0M+$4.3M$6.3M7.7%
Year 5$2.1M+$4.3M$6.4M7.8%
$17.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$69.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$52.1M
Value Created
$6.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$42.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$816K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$807K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$496K$744K$992K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$63K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-25.1%-3.4%4.2%
P65
Net-to-Gross12.4%22.8%32.2%42.6%
P0
Occupancy28.4%29.6%50.0%63.3%
P20
Rev/Bed$927K$263K$459K$927K
P73
Exp/Bed$907K$211K$441K$1.2M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML