Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEN BROECK HOSPITAL - KMI 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEN BROECK HOSPITAL - KMI
CCN 184008 | KY | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $7.7M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$395K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$530K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$525K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$323K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$530K$530K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$510K$15K$525K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$241K$323K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$133K$265K$398K$530K$530K$530K$530K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$131K$262K$394K$525K$525K$525K$525K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$215K$323K$323K$323K$323K$323K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$380K$760K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x39% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.7M$7.7M29.1%
Year 1$7.9M+$930K$8.9M33.5%
Year 2$8.2M+$1.4M$9.6M36.1%
Year 3$8.4M+$1.4M$9.8M37.1%
Year 4$8.7M+$1.4M$10.1M38.0%
Year 5$8.9M+$1.4M$10.3M39.0%
$77.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$113.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$36.6M
Value Created
$10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$12.3M
Organic Growth
$13.9M
RCM Value Creation
$10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$265K$398K$530K$636K
Denial Rate Reductio$262K$394K$525K$630K
A/R Days Reduction$161K$242K$323K$387K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$697K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.1%-10.4%-0.2%13.6%
P91
Net-to-Gross55.4%18.5%27.4%33.5%
P83
Occupancy81.2%26.0%43.8%61.2%
P94
Rev/Bed$414K$374K$776K$1.4M
P28
Exp/Bed$294K$367K$754K$1.5M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML