Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GATEWAY REHAB AT FLORENCE 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GATEWAY REHAB AT FLORENCE
CCN 183030 | KY | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.5M → Pro Forma $-2.4M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$867K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$891K
Risk-Adjusted
-$299K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$452K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$448K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$275K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$452K$452K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$435K$12K$448K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$206K$275K$867K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$113K$226K$339K$452K$452K$452K$452K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$448K$448K$448K$448K
A/R Days Reduction$0$92K$183K$275K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$324K$648K$965K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.5M$-3.5M-15.7%
Year 1$-3.7M+$793K$-2.9M-12.6%
Year 2$-3.8M+$1.2M$-2.6M-11.4%
Year 3$-3.9M+$1.2M$-2.7M-11.9%
Year 4$-4.0M+$1.2M$-2.8M-12.4%
Year 5$-4.1M+$1.2M$-2.9M-12.9%
$-35.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-32.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.3M
Value Created
$-2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.6M
Organic Growth
$11.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$226K$339K$452K$543K
Denial Rate Reductio$224K$336K$448K$537K
A/R Days Reduction$138K$206K$275K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$595K$892K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.7%-11.0%-0.6%9.3%
P15
Net-to-Gross56.9%26.1%30.7%40.9%
P91
Occupancy92.2%25.6%35.9%61.9%
P98
Rev/Bed$565K$565K$852K$1.4M
P25
Exp/Bed$654K$596K$969K$1.3M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML