Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KENTUCKY RIVER MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KENTUCKY RIVER MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 180139 | KY | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $595K (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$595K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$639K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$635K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$629K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$387K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$635K$635K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$612K$17K$629K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$97K$289K$387K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$159K$318K$477K$635K$635K$635K$635K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$157K$315K$472K$629K$629K$629K$629K
A/R Days Reduction$0$129K$258K$387K$387K$387K$387K$387K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$455K$910K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-15.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
21.8x
Headroom (turns)
336%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 336% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -15.3x, adding 114.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-3.4%
Year 1$-1.1M+$1.1M$5K0.0%
Year 2$-1.1M+$1.7M$529K1.7%
Year 3$-1.2M+$1.7M$495K1.6%
Year 4$-1.2M+$1.7M$460K1.4%
Year 5$-1.2M+$1.7M$423K1.3%
$-10.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.4M
Value Created
$423K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.7M
Organic Growth
$16.7M
RCM Value Creation
$423K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$318K$477K$635K$763K
Denial Rate Reductio$315K$472K$629K$755K
A/R Days Reduction$193K$290K$387K$464K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$836K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.4%-11.0%-1.0%10.3%
P46
Net-to-Gross14.7%20.7%30.7%41.1%
P7
Occupancy25.6%25.6%35.9%53.5%
P25
Rev/Bed$648K$472K$844K$1.3M
P33
Exp/Bed$670K$472K$961K$1.3M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML