Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSP 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE CUMBERLAND REGIONAL HOSP
CCN 180132 | KY | 179 beds | Current EBITDA $15.6M → Pro Forma $30.2M (+$14.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$278.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$30.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$14.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.3M (vs $14.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$178K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.6M$5.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.4M$153K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$855K$2.5M$3.4M$10.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$178K$178K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$8.0M$11.9M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
10.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
11.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
12.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.1x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.4x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.6M$15.6M5.6%
Year 1$16.0M+$9.8M$25.8M9.3%
Year 2$16.5M+$14.7M$31.2M11.2%
Year 3$17.0M+$14.7M$31.7M11.4%
Year 4$17.5M+$14.7M$32.2M11.6%
Year 5$18.1M+$14.7M$32.7M11.7%
$155.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$359.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$204.1M
Value Created
$32.7M
Exit EBITDA
$24.8M
Organic Growth
$146.6M
RCM Value Creation
$32.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$134K$178K$214K
Total$7.3M$11.0M$14.7M$17.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.6%-9.8%-1.0%6.6%
P69
Net-to-Gross16.6%18.6%29.5%34.6%
P14
Occupancy64.6%47.3%54.7%63.9%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.6M$718K$1.3M$1.6M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.5M$726K$1.4M$1.6M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML