Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 180019 | KY | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$75.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$915K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$231K$684K$915K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$376K$752K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$372K$745K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$305K$610K$915K$915K$915K$915K$915K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x77% / 17.4x82% / 19.7x86% / 22.0x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.3x
9.0x72% / 15.1x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x
10.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
11.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.1x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x
12.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
51%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 51% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M3.2%
Year 1$2.4M+$2.6M$5.1M6.8%
Year 2$2.5M+$4.0M$6.5M8.6%
Year 3$2.6M+$4.0M$6.5M8.7%
Year 4$2.7M+$4.0M$6.6M8.8%
Year 5$2.7M+$4.0M$6.7M8.9%
$23.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$73.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.0M
Value Created
$6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$3.8M
Organic Growth
$39.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$752K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$745K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$458K$686K$915K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$58K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.2%-9.6%0.7%10.4%
P56
Net-to-Gross18.6%17.5%24.9%41.6%
P29
Occupancy16.1%42.9%53.6%66.4%
P0
Rev/Bed$752K$426K$1.0M$1.5M
P42
Exp/Bed$728K$417K$1.0M$1.5M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML