Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL KANSAS 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MERCY HOSPITAL KANSAS
CCN 173300 | KS | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $15.9M → Pro Forma $21.6M (+$5.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$108.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$5.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $5.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$69K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$333K$987K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$69K$69K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$542K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$537K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$440K$880K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.6M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.9M$15.9M14.7%
Year 1$16.4M+$3.8M$20.2M18.6%
Year 2$16.9M+$5.7M$22.6M20.8%
Year 3$17.4M+$5.7M$23.1M21.3%
Year 4$17.9M+$5.7M$23.6M21.8%
Year 5$18.4M+$5.7M$24.1M22.3%
$159.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$265.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$106.5M
Value Created
$24.1M
Exit EBITDA
$25.3M
Organic Growth
$57.1M
RCM Value Creation
$24.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$660K$990K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$52K$69K$83K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.7%-28.2%-18.3%-7.2%
P95
Net-to-Gross34.9%34.8%54.4%76.1%
P25
Occupancy6.0%20.0%33.4%51.6%
P2
Rev/Bed$2.6M$376K$623K$1.1M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.2M$448K$849K$1.2M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML