Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWBROOK REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEADOWBROOK REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 173033 | KS | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $164K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$164K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$892K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$893K
Risk-Adjusted
-$330K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$465K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$460K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$283K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$465K$465K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$448K$13K$460K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$212K$283K$892K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$116K$232K$349K$465K$465K$465K$465K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$115K$230K$345K$460K$460K$460K$460K
A/R Days Reduction$0$94K$189K$283K$283K$283K$283K$283K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$333K$666K$992K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x127% / 59.7x132% / 66.7x136% / 73.7x138% / 77.2x141% / 80.7x
9.0x121% / 52.7x126% / 58.9x131% / 65.1x133% / 68.2x135% / 71.3x
10.0x116% / 47.1x121% / 52.7x125% / 58.3x128% / 61.1x130% / 63.9x
11.0x112% / 42.5x117% / 47.6x121% / 52.7x123% / 55.2x125% / 57.8x
12.0x108% / 38.7x113% / 43.4x117% / 48.0x119% / 50.4x121% / 52.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
85%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 85% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$164K$164K0.7%
Year 1$169K+$815K$985K4.2%
Year 2$174K+$1.2M$1.4M6.0%
Year 3$179K+$1.2M$1.4M6.0%
Year 4$185K+$1.2M$1.4M6.1%
Year 5$190K+$1.2M$1.4M6.1%
$1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.9M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$262K
Organic Growth
$12.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$232K$349K$465K$558K
Denial Rate Reductio$230K$345K$460K$552K
A/R Days Reduction$141K$212K$283K$339K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$612K$917K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-22.1%-8.0%0.7%
P74
Net-to-Gross100.0%29.1%33.3%42.0%
P97
Occupancy77.0%26.6%35.5%52.2%
P87
Rev/Bed$431K$391K$813K$1.4M
P26
Exp/Bed$428K$505K$1.0M$1.4M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML