Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - KANSAS CITY 2026-04-26 09:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - KANSAS CITY
CCN 172005 | KS | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.5M → Pro Forma $-2.3M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$860K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$879K
Risk-Adjusted
-$301K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$449K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$444K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$273K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$449K$449K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$432K$12K$444K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$204K$273K$860K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$112K$224K$336K$449K$449K$449K$449K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$111K$222K$333K$444K$444K$444K$444K
A/R Days Reduction$0$91K$182K$273K$273K$273K$273K$273K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$321K$643K$957K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.5M$-3.5M-15.5%
Year 1$-3.6M+$787K$-2.8M-12.5%
Year 2$-3.7M+$1.2M$-2.5M-11.2%
Year 3$-3.8M+$1.2M$-2.6M-11.7%
Year 4$-3.9M+$1.2M$-2.7M-12.2%
Year 5$-4.0M+$1.2M$-2.9M-12.7%
$-34.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-31.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.4M
Value Created
$-2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.5M
Organic Growth
$11.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$224K$336K$449K$538K
Denial Rate Reductio$222K$333K$444K$533K
A/R Days Reduction$136K$205K$273K$328K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$590K$885K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.5%-29.0%-18.7%-7.9%
P58
Net-to-Gross15.2%35.4%55.7%76.2%
P2
Occupancy84.8%20.0%33.5%51.6%
P97
Rev/Bed$561K$373K$634K$1.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$648K$440K$827K$1.2M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML