Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MITCHELL CO HOSP HEALTH SYSTEMS 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MITCHELL CO HOSP HEALTH SYSTEMS
CCN 171375 | KS | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.0M → Pro Forma $-596K (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-596K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$344K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$549K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$543K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$334K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$549K$549K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$528K$15K$543K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$84K$250K$334K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT83.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$137K$274K$412K$549K$549K$549K$549K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$136K$272K$407K$543K$543K$543K$543K
A/R Days Reduction$0$111K$223K$334K$334K$334K$334K$334K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$393K$786K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.0M$-2.0M-7.4%
Year 1$-2.1M+$962K$-1.1M-4.1%
Year 2$-2.2M+$1.4M$-720K-2.6%
Year 3$-2.2M+$1.4M$-785K-2.9%
Year 4$-2.3M+$1.4M$-852K-3.1%
Year 5$-2.4M+$1.4M$-921K-3.4%
$-20.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-10.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$-921K
Exit EBITDA
$-3.2M
Organic Growth
$14.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-921K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$274K$412K$549K$659K
Denial Rate Reductio$272K$407K$543K$652K
A/R Days Reduction$167K$250K$334K$401K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$722K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.4%-31.3%-20.7%-11.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross55.8%50.5%61.3%83.2%
P35
Occupancy80.8%18.1%27.0%39.4%
P99
Rev/Bed$1.5M$460K$731K$1.3M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.6M$583K$932K$1.4M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML