Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLAY COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLAY COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 171371 | KS | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.4M → Pro Forma $-2.8M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$535K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$609K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$603K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$371K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$609K$609K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$587K$17K$603K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$277K$371K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT82.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$152K$305K$457K$609K$609K$609K$609K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$151K$302K$452K$603K$603K$603K$603K
A/R Days Reduction$0$124K$247K$371K$371K$371K$371K$371K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$436K$873K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.4M$-4.4M-14.5%
Year 1$-4.6M+$1.1M$-3.5M-11.5%
Year 2$-4.7M+$1.6M$-3.1M-10.1%
Year 3$-4.8M+$1.6M$-3.2M-10.6%
Year 4$-5.0M+$1.6M$-3.4M-11.1%
Year 5$-5.1M+$1.6M$-3.5M-11.6%
$-44.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-38.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.5M
Value Created
$-3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.0M
Organic Growth
$16.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$305K$457K$609K$731K
Denial Rate Reductio$302K$452K$603K$724K
A/R Days Reduction$185K$278K$371K$445K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$801K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 109 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.5%-30.8%-20.6%-11.7%
P67
Net-to-Gross56.0%49.9%60.6%82.3%
P38
Occupancy39.4%19.5%27.0%40.2%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.5M$460K$731K$1.3M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.7M$583K$932K$1.4M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML