Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ANDERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ANDERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 171316 | KS | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.3M → Pro Forma $-2.8M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$981K
Risk-Adjusted
-$483K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$557K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$551K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$339K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$557K$557K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$536K$15K$551K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$253K$339K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$139K$278K$417K$557K$557K$557K$557K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$275K$413K$551K$551K$551K$551K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$226K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$399K$797K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.3M$-4.3M-15.4%
Year 1$-4.4M+$976K$-3.4M-12.3%
Year 2$-4.5M+$1.5M$-3.1M-11.1%
Year 3$-4.7M+$1.5M$-3.2M-11.6%
Year 4$-4.8M+$1.5M$-3.4M-12.1%
Year 5$-5.0M+$1.5M$-3.5M-12.6%
$-42.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-38.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.3M
Value Created
$-3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.8M
Organic Growth
$14.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$278K$417K$557K$668K
Denial Rate Reductio$275K$413K$551K$661K
A/R Days Reduction$169K$254K$339K$406K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$732K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 61 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.4%-31.6%-19.6%-10.5%
P62
Net-to-Gross67.1%51.9%60.6%81.9%
P57
Occupancy35.9%19.5%26.2%39.3%
P66
Rev/Bed$2.3M$570K$893K$1.4M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.7M$713K$990K$1.6M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML