Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY HOSPITAL
CCN 170199 | KS | 7 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$994K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$994K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+688bps
Margin Improvement
$554K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$994K
Modeled Uplift
$594K
Risk-Adjusted
-$400K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$289K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$286K
+198bp
Net Collection Rate
Revenue | 18mo ramp
$233K
+161bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$176K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$994K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$289K$289K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$278K$8K$286K$012mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT96.2% BENCHMARK$233K$0$233K$018mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$131K$176K$554K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$72K$144K$217K$289K$289K$289K$289K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$72K$143K$215K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Net Collection Rate$0$39K$78K$117K$155K$233K$233K$233K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$117K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$246K$492K$734K$916K$994K$994K$994K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $994K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M21.2%
Year 1$3.1M+$663K$3.8M26.4%
Year 2$3.2M+$994K$4.2M29.3%
Year 3$3.3M+$994K$4.3M30.0%
Year 4$3.4M+$994K$4.4M30.7%
Year 5$3.5M+$994K$4.5M31.4%
$30.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.3M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.9M
Organic Growth
$9.9M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$144K$217K$289K$347K
Denial Rate Reductio$143K$215K$286K$344K
Net Collection Rate$117K$175K$233K$280K
A/R Days Reduction$88K$132K$176K$211K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$497K$745K$994K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.2%-22.8%-18.1%-13.0%
P100
Net-to-Gross33.5%56.5%62.4%96.2%
P9
Occupancy3.7%20.5%23.1%28.8%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.1M$718K$934K$1.5M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.6M$934K$1.2M$1.8M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML