Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS SPINE & SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS SPINE & SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 170196 | KS | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $13.3M → Pro Forma $16.9M (+$3.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$847K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$45K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$214K$633K$847K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$45K$45K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$348K$696K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$345K$689K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$282K$565K$847K$847K$847K$847K$847K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$45K$45K$45K$45K$45K$45K
Cumulative$0$997K$2.0M$3.0M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.3M$13.3M19.1%
Year 1$13.7M+$2.4M$16.1M23.2%
Year 2$14.1M+$3.7M$17.8M25.5%
Year 3$14.5M+$3.7M$18.2M26.1%
Year 4$15.0M+$3.7M$18.6M26.7%
Year 5$15.4M+$3.7M$19.1M27.4%
$132.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$209.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$76.8M
Value Created
$19.1M
Exit EBITDA
$21.2M
Organic Growth
$36.6M
RCM Value Creation
$19.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$696K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$689K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$423K$635K$847K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$45K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.1%-30.6%-19.1%-8.4%
P98
Net-to-Gross30.0%38.5%56.2%76.3%
P13
Occupancy31.5%19.8%32.7%49.9%
P47
Rev/Bed$2.0M$390K$639K$1.1M
P93
Exp/Bed$1.6M$456K$856K$1.2M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML