Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS CITY ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS CITY ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE
CCN 170188 | KS | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $18.2M → Pro Forma $22.8M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$86.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$55K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$265K$785K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$55K$55K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT84.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$431K$863K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$427K$854K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$350K$700K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K$55K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x
11.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.2M$18.2M21.1%
Year 1$18.8M+$3.0M$21.8M25.2%
Year 2$19.3M+$4.5M$23.9M27.7%
Year 3$19.9M+$4.5M$24.4M28.3%
Year 4$20.5M+$4.5M$25.0M29.0%
Year 5$21.1M+$4.5M$25.7M29.7%
$182.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$282.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$100.1M
Value Created
$25.7M
Exit EBITDA
$29.0M
Organic Growth
$45.4M
RCM Value Creation
$25.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$863K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$854K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$525K$787K$1.0M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$41K$55K$66K
Total$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.1%-31.3%-20.8%-13.0%
P99
Net-to-Gross28.2%51.3%61.9%84.0%
P4
Occupancy31.9%18.1%26.3%40.0%
P59
Rev/Bed$5.1M$455K$679K$1.2M
P99
Exp/Bed$4.0M$573K$919K$1.3M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML