Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SALINA SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SALINA SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 170187 | KS | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $5.9M → Pro Forma $7.4M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$949K
Risk-Adjusted
-$541K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$567K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$561K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$345K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$567K$567K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$545K$16K$561K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$87K$258K$345K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT84.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$142K$283K$425K$567K$567K$567K$567K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$140K$280K$421K$561K$561K$561K$561K
A/R Days Reduction$0$115K$230K$345K$345K$345K$345K$345K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$406K$812K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.9M$5.9M20.9%
Year 1$6.1M+$993K$7.1M25.0%
Year 2$6.3M+$1.5M$7.8M27.4%
Year 3$6.5M+$1.5M$8.0M28.1%
Year 4$6.7M+$1.5M$8.2M28.8%
Year 5$6.9M+$1.5M$8.3M29.5%
$59.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$91.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$32.7M
Value Created
$8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$9.4M
Organic Growth
$14.9M
RCM Value Creation
$8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$283K$425K$567K$680K
Denial Rate Reductio$280K$421K$561K$673K
A/R Days Reduction$172K$259K$345K$414K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$745K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.9%-31.3%-20.8%-13.0%
P98
Net-to-Gross35.8%51.3%61.9%84.0%
P11
Occupancy23.2%18.1%26.3%40.0%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.8M$455K$679K$1.2M
P88
Exp/Bed$1.4M$573K$919K$1.3M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML