Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS SURGERY & RECOVERY CENTER
CCN 170183 | KS | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $12.6M → Pro Forma $15.9M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$12.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$764K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$193K$571K$764K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$314K$628K$942K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$311K$622K$932K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$255K$509K$764K$764K$764K$764K$764K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$899K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$12.6M$12.6M20.0%
Year 1$12.9M+$2.2M$15.1M24.1%
Year 2$13.3M+$3.3M$16.6M26.5%
Year 3$13.7M+$3.3M$17.0M27.1%
Year 4$14.1M+$3.3M$17.4M27.8%
Year 5$14.6M+$3.3M$17.9M28.5%
$125.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$196.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$70.9M
Value Created
$17.9M
Exit EBITDA
$20.0M
Organic Growth
$33.0M
RCM Value Creation
$17.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$628K$942K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$622K$932K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$382K$573K$764K$917K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.0%-31.3%-19.6%-7.8%
P97
Net-to-Gross33.8%42.1%58.0%81.3%
P14
Occupancy7.7%19.5%28.9%45.9%
P3
Rev/Bed$2.1M$406K$639K$1.1M
P95
Exp/Bed$1.7M$506K$856K$1.2M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML