Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST CATHERINE - DODGE CITY 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST CATHERINE - DODGE CITY
CCN 170175 | KS | 89 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $8.4M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$616K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$974K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$155K$460K$616K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$253K$506K$759K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$250K$501K$751K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$205K$410K$616K$616K$616K$616K$616K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$725K$1.4M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x56% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M11.4%
Year 1$6.0M+$1.8M$7.7M15.3%
Year 2$6.1M+$2.7M$8.8M17.4%
Year 3$6.3M+$2.7M$9.0M17.7%
Year 4$6.5M+$2.7M$9.2M18.1%
Year 5$6.7M+$2.7M$9.4M18.5%
$57.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$103.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.2M
Value Created
$9.4M
Exit EBITDA
$9.2M
Organic Growth
$26.6M
RCM Value Creation
$9.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$506K$759K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$501K$751K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$308K$462K$616K$739K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.4%-17.6%-7.9%0.6%
P96
Net-to-Gross29.8%25.8%31.9%38.8%
P36
Occupancy12.5%35.5%43.8%53.7%
P0
Rev/Bed$569K$367K$868K$1.2M
P36
Exp/Bed$504K$485K$1.0M$1.4M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML