Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL WICHITA 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIA CHRISTI HOSPITAL WICHITA
CCN 170122 | KS | 635 beds | Current EBITDA $-47.4M → Pro Forma $-14.5M (+$32.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$625.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-47.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-14.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$32.9M
Modeled Uplift
$21.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.6M (vs $32.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$400K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.5M$12.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.0M$344K$12.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.7M$7.6M$24.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$400K$400K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.4M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M$12.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$200K$400K$400K$400K$400K$400K$400K
Cumulative$0$9.0M$17.9M$26.7M$32.9M$32.9M$32.9M$32.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-47.4M$-47.4M-7.6%
Year 1$-48.8M+$21.9M$-26.9M-4.3%
Year 2$-50.3M+$32.9M$-17.4M-2.8%
Year 3$-51.8M+$32.9M$-18.9M-3.0%
Year 4$-53.4M+$32.9M$-20.5M-3.3%
Year 5$-55.0M+$32.9M$-22.1M-3.5%
$-474.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-242.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$231.5M
Value Created
$-22.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-75.5M
Organic Growth
$329.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-22.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.3M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.2M$9.3M$12.4M$14.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
Clean Claim Rate$200K$300K$400K$480K
Total$16.5M$24.7M$32.9M$39.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 650 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.6%-14.0%-4.4%5.1%
P40
Net-to-Gross25.3%19.3%26.0%32.1%
P47
Occupancy68.9%65.2%74.7%82.0%
P35
Rev/Bed$985K$1.3M$1.7M$2.3M
P11
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML