Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH OTTAWA 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH OTTAWA
CCN 170014 | KS | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.7M → Pro Forma $59K (+$2.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$53.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$59K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$650K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$34K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.0M$29K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$164K$486K$650K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$34K$34K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$267K$534K$801K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$264K$529K$793K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$217K$433K$650K$650K$650K$650K$650K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K$34K
Cumulative$0$765K$1.5M$2.3M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-393.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
400.0x
Headroom (turns)
6154%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6154% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -393.5x, adding 492.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.7M$-2.7M-5.2%
Year 1$-2.8M+$1.9M$-960K-1.8%
Year 2$-2.9M+$2.8M$-108K-0.2%
Year 3$-3.0M+$2.8M$-196K-0.4%
Year 4$-3.1M+$2.8M$-286K-0.5%
Year 5$-3.2M+$2.8M$-379K-0.7%
$-27.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.3M
Value Created
$-379K
Exit EBITDA
$-4.4M
Organic Growth
$28.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-379K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$534K$801K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$529K$793K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$325K$487K$650K$780K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$34K$41K
Total$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.2%-30.6%-18.9%-8.0%
P81
Net-to-Gross18.1%36.9%56.0%76.2%
P4
Occupancy28.7%19.8%33.0%50.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.5M$383K$634K$1.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.6M$448K$847K$1.2M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML