Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAYS MEDICAL CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAYS MEDICAL CENTER INC.
CCN 170013 | KS | 136 beds | Current EBITDA $-26.5M → Pro Forma $-15.2M (+$11.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$215.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-26.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-15.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$11.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.4M (vs $11.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$138K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$118K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$660K$2.0M$2.6M$8.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$138K$138K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$873K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$69K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-26.5M$-26.5M-12.3%
Year 1$-27.3M+$7.5M$-19.7M-9.2%
Year 2$-28.1M+$11.3M$-16.8M-7.8%
Year 3$-28.9M+$11.3M$-17.6M-8.2%
Year 4$-29.8M+$11.3M$-18.5M-8.6%
Year 5$-30.7M+$11.3M$-19.4M-9.0%
$-264.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-213.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.6M
Value Created
$-19.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-42.2M
Organic Growth
$113.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-19.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$69K$103K$138K$165K
Total$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.3%-13.7%-7.9%0.8%
P35
Net-to-Gross32.2%21.1%26.7%31.6%
P76
Occupancy39.5%36.6%43.3%53.3%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.6M$612K$1.2M$1.6M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.3M$1.8M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML