Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOHN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAINT JOHN HOSPITAL
CCN 170009 | KS | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.6M → Pro Forma $-4.2M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$934K
Risk-Adjusted
-$480K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$538K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$532K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$327K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$538K$538K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$517K$15K$532K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$245K$327K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$134K$269K$403K$538K$538K$538K$538K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$133K$266K$399K$532K$532K$532K$532K
A/R Days Reduction$0$109K$218K$327K$327K$327K$327K$327K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$385K$770K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.6M$-5.6M-20.8%
Year 1$-5.8M+$943K$-4.8M-17.9%
Year 2$-5.9M+$1.4M$-4.5M-16.8%
Year 3$-6.1M+$1.4M$-4.7M-17.5%
Year 4$-6.3M+$1.4M$-4.9M-18.1%
Year 5$-6.5M+$1.4M$-5.1M-18.8%
$-55.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-55.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$173K
Value Created
$-5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.9M
Organic Growth
$14.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$269K$403K$538K$645K
Denial Rate Reductio$266K$399K$532K$639K
A/R Days Reduction$164K$245K$327K$392K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$707K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.8%-31.3%-20.7%-11.7%
P49
Net-to-Gross16.8%47.0%60.2%81.9%
P1
Occupancy38.7%17.9%27.0%40.2%
P68
Rev/Bed$1.2M$454K$730K$1.3M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.5M$573K$919K$1.4M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML