Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HEALTH NETWORK RE 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HEALTH NETWORK RE
CCN 163027 | IA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $185K → Pro Forma $987K (+$803K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$185K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$803K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$987K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$585K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$803K
Modeled Uplift
$547K
Risk-Adjusted
-$256K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$305K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$302K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$186K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$803K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$305K$305K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$294K$8K$302K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$139K$186K$585K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$76K$153K$229K$305K$305K$305K$305K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$76K$151K$227K$302K$302K$302K$302K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$124K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$219K$437K$651K$803K$803K$803K$803K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $803K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x106% / 37.0x111% / 41.5x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.2x119% / 50.4x
9.0x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.5x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.5x114% / 44.5x
10.0x96% / 28.9x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.1x107% / 37.9x109% / 39.7x
11.0x92% / 26.0x96% / 29.3x101% / 32.5x103% / 34.2x105% / 35.8x
12.0x88% / 23.6x93% / 26.6x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$185K$185K1.2%
Year 1$190K+$535K$725K4.8%
Year 2$196K+$803K$999K6.5%
Year 3$202K+$803K$1.0M6.6%
Year 4$208K+$803K$1.0M6.6%
Year 5$214K+$803K$1.0M6.7%
$1.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$11.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.3M
Value Created
$1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$294K
Organic Growth
$8.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$153K$229K$305K$366K
Denial Rate Reductio$151K$227K$302K$362K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$139K$186K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$401K$602K$803K$963K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-13.8%-8.4%-3.5%
P90
Net-to-Gross60.3%46.2%52.3%58.9%
P79
Occupancy60.3%15.3%21.7%34.6%
P91
Rev/Bed$381K$941K$1.3M$1.8M
P5
Exp/Bed$377K$957K$1.4M$2.1M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML