Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - DES MOINES 2026-04-26 09:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - DES MOINES
CCN 162003 | IA | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $525K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$649K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$525K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$649K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$471K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$649K
Modeled Uplift
$466K
Risk-Adjusted
-$183K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$246K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$245K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$149K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$649K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$246K$246K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$236K$8K$245K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$112K$149K$471K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$123K$184K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$183K$245K$245K$245K$245K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$100K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$177K$354K$527K$649K$649K$649K$649K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $649K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.3x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x82% / 20.1x
9.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x
10.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
11.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
12.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$525K$525K4.3%
Year 1$541K+$433K$974K7.9%
Year 2$557K+$649K$1.2M9.8%
Year 3$574K+$649K$1.2M10.0%
Year 4$591K+$649K$1.2M10.1%
Year 5$609K+$649K$1.3M10.2%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$13.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.6M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$837K
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$123K$184K$246K$295K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$183K$245K$293K
A/R Days Reduction$75K$112K$149K$179K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$325K$487K$649K$779K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-14.1%-8.2%-3.1%
P95
Net-to-Gross14.4%47.3%53.3%60.6%
P0
Occupancy66.5%15.3%21.0%33.8%
P96
Rev/Bed$409K$941K$1.3M$1.9M
P4
Exp/Bed$392K$975K$1.4M$2.1M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML