Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HEGG MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HEGG MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 161336 | IA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $-1.9M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$915K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$754K
Risk-Adjusted
-$501K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$477K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$472K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$290K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$477K$477K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$459K$13K$472K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$217K$290K$915K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$119K$238K$358K$477K$477K$477K$477K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$118K$236K$354K$472K$472K$472K$472K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$193K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$342K$683K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-13.2%
Year 1$-3.2M+$836K$-2.4M-10.1%
Year 2$-3.3M+$1.3M$-2.1M-8.8%
Year 3$-3.4M+$1.3M$-2.2M-9.2%
Year 4$-3.6M+$1.3M$-2.3M-9.6%
Year 5$-3.7M+$1.3M$-2.4M-10.1%
$-31.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-26.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$-2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.0M
Organic Growth
$12.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$238K$358K$477K$572K
Denial Rate Reductio$236K$354K$472K$567K
A/R Days Reduction$145K$218K$290K$348K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$627K$941K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.2%-14.5%-8.3%-3.1%
P29
Net-to-Gross71.8%47.2%53.5%61.5%
P93
Occupancy13.4%14.6%20.6%32.9%
P22
Rev/Bed$954K$906K$1.3M$1.8M
P28
Exp/Bed$1.1M$971K$1.4M$2.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML