Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER - DEWITT 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GENESIS MEDICAL CENTER - DEWITT
CCN 161313 | IA | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $3.7M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$883K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$771K
Risk-Adjusted
-$441K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$461K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$456K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$280K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$461K$461K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$443K$13K$456K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$210K$280K$883K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$115K$230K$345K$461K$461K$461K$461K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$114K$228K$342K$456K$456K$456K$456K
A/R Days Reduction$0$93K$187K$280K$280K$280K$280K$280K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$330K$660K$982K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M10.9%
Year 1$2.6M+$808K$3.4M14.7%
Year 2$2.7M+$1.2M$3.9M16.8%
Year 3$2.7M+$1.2M$4.0M17.2%
Year 4$2.8M+$1.2M$4.0M17.5%
Year 5$2.9M+$1.2M$4.1M17.9%
$25.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$45.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.2M
Value Created
$4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$12.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$230K$345K$461K$553K
Denial Rate Reductio$228K$342K$456K$547K
A/R Days Reduction$140K$210K$280K$336K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$606K$909K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.9%-13.3%-8.2%-2.9%
P99
Net-to-Gross42.7%50.3%54.8%62.1%
P5
Occupancy26.6%14.3%20.0%31.7%
P66
Rev/Bed$1.8M$955K$1.4M$1.9M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML