Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASSURANCE HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASSURANCE HEALTH INDIANAPOLIS
CCN 154064 | IN | 43 beds | Current EBITDA $1.7M → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$710K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$710K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$516K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$710K
Modeled Uplift
$528K
Risk-Adjusted
-$182K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$269K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$267K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$164K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$710K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$269K$269K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$259K$8K$267K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$41K$123K$164K$516K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$67K$135K$202K$269K$269K$269K$269K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$67K$134K$201K$267K$267K$267K$267K
A/R Days Reduction$0$55K$109K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$194K$387K$576K$710K$710K$710K$710K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $710K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.7M$1.7M12.9%
Year 1$1.8M+$473K$2.3M16.8%
Year 2$1.8M+$710K$2.5M18.9%
Year 3$1.9M+$710K$2.6M19.3%
Year 4$1.9M+$710K$2.7M19.7%
Year 5$2.0M+$710K$2.7M20.2%
$17.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.6M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$7.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$135K$202K$269K$323K
Denial Rate Reductio$134K$201K$267K$321K
A/R Days Reduction$82K$123K$164K$197K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$355K$533K$710K$852K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.9%-11.7%-1.7%9.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross60.3%27.5%32.3%40.1%
P94
Occupancy83.4%26.4%42.5%62.0%
P92
Rev/Bed$313K$413K$1.2M$2.0M
P15
Exp/Bed$273K$413K$1.2M$1.9M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML