Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY STROKE AND REHABILITATION 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMMUNITY STROKE AND REHABILITATION
CCN 153045 | IN | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $3.5M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$405K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$581K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$575K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$353K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$581K$581K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$559K$16K$575K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$89K$264K$353K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$145K$290K$436K$581K$581K$581K$581K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$144K$288K$431K$575K$575K$575K$575K
A/R Days Reduction$0$118K$236K$353K$353K$353K$353K$353K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$416K$832K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
9.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M6.7%
Year 1$2.0M+$1.0M$3.0M10.4%
Year 2$2.1M+$1.5M$3.6M12.4%
Year 3$2.1M+$1.5M$3.7M12.6%
Year 4$2.2M+$1.5M$3.7M12.8%
Year 5$2.3M+$1.5M$3.8M13.1%
$19.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.2M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.1M
Organic Growth
$15.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$290K$436K$581K$697K
Denial Rate Reductio$288K$431K$575K$690K
A/R Days Reduction$177K$265K$353K$424K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$22K
Total$764K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.7%-12.4%-2.9%6.8%
P73
Net-to-Gross33.7%28.7%32.0%39.0%
P59
Occupancy75.7%23.9%39.2%60.0%
P87
Rev/Bed$830K$440K$1.3M$2.0M
P37
Exp/Bed$774K$432K$1.3M$2.1M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML