Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAFAYETTE REGIONAL REHABILITATION HO 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAFAYETTE REGIONAL REHABILITATION HO
CCN 153042 | IN | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$830K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$830K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$605K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$830K
Modeled Uplift
$561K
Risk-Adjusted
-$269K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$315K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$312K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$192K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$830K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$315K$315K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$304K$9K$312K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$143K$192K$605K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$158K$237K$315K$315K$315K$315K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$156K$234K$312K$312K$312K$312K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$226K$452K$673K$830K$830K$830K$830K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $830K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M7.4%
Year 1$1.2M+$553K$1.8M11.2%
Year 2$1.2M+$830K$2.1M13.1%
Year 3$1.3M+$830K$2.1M13.4%
Year 4$1.3M+$830K$2.1M13.6%
Year 5$1.4M+$830K$2.2M13.9%
$11.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.3M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$158K$237K$315K$378K
Denial Rate Reductio$156K$234K$312K$375K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$144K$192K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$415K$622K$830K$995K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.4%-11.7%-2.9%7.5%
P73
Net-to-Gross76.1%27.6%32.3%39.9%
P98
Occupancy59.4%25.8%42.1%61.5%
P71
Rev/Bed$394K$427K$1.3M$2.0M
P20
Exp/Bed$365K$429K$1.4M$2.0M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML