Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT MERCY 2026-04-26 12:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENT MERCY
CCN 151308 | IN | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$973K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$809K
Risk-Adjusted
-$526K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$507K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$502K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$309K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$507K$507K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$488K$14K$502K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$231K$309K$973K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$127K$254K$381K$507K$507K$507K$507K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$251K$377K$502K$502K$502K$502K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$206K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$363K$727K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x
9.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
10.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
12.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M5.3%
Year 1$1.4M+$890K$2.3M9.0%
Year 2$1.4M+$1.3M$2.8M10.9%
Year 3$1.5M+$1.3M$2.8M11.1%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.3M$2.9M11.2%
Year 5$1.6M+$1.3M$2.9M11.4%
$13.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.4M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$13.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$254K$381K$507K$609K
Denial Rate Reductio$251K$377K$502K$603K
A/R Days Reduction$154K$232K$309K$370K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$667K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.3%-19.8%-5.6%3.0%
P79
Net-to-Gross30.8%29.0%33.3%44.2%
P38
Occupancy16.6%20.3%31.7%45.1%
P13
Rev/Bed$1.4M$962K$1.7M$2.0M
P39
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.8M$2.6M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML