Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LUTHERAN DOWNTOWN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LUTHERAN DOWNTOWN HOSPITAL
CCN 150047 | IN | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.4M → Pro Forma $-6.6M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$664K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$167K$497K$664K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$273K$546K$818K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$270K$540K$810K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$221K$443K$664K$664K$664K$664K$664K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$782K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.4M$-9.4M-17.3%
Year 1$-9.7M+$1.9M$-7.8M-14.3%
Year 2$-10.0M+$2.9M$-7.1M-13.1%
Year 3$-10.3M+$2.9M$-7.4M-13.6%
Year 4$-10.6M+$2.9M$-7.7M-14.2%
Year 5$-10.9M+$2.9M$-8.1M-14.8%
$-94.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-88.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.6M
Value Created
$-8.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.0M
Organic Growth
$28.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$546K$818K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$540K$810K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$332K$498K$664K$797K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.3%-11.7%1.2%14.5%
P15
Net-to-Gross16.9%26.1%32.0%41.4%
P3
Occupancy23.0%36.4%52.4%68.5%
P5
Rev/Bed$909K$354K$787K$2.0M
P51
Exp/Bed$1.1M$326K$767K$1.9M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML