Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNION HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNION HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 150023 | IN | 258 beds | Current EBITDA $22.1M → Pro Forma $52.8M (+$30.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$581.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$30.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$52.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$22.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$30.6M
Modeled Uplift
$21.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.9M (vs $30.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$372K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$30.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.6M$11.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.2M$320K$11.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.3M$7.1M$22.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$372K$372K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$186K$372K$372K$372K$372K$372K$372K
Cumulative$0$8.3M$16.7M$24.8M$30.6M$30.6M$30.6M$30.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $30.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.5x
9.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
10.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.3x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x
11.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
12.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
45%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 45% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.1M$22.1M3.8%
Year 1$22.8M+$20.4M$43.2M7.4%
Year 2$23.5M+$30.6M$54.1M9.3%
Year 3$24.2M+$30.6M$54.8M9.4%
Year 4$24.9M+$30.6M$55.5M9.5%
Year 5$25.7M+$30.6M$56.3M9.7%
$221.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$619.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$397.7M
Value Created
$56.3M
Exit EBITDA
$35.3M
Organic Growth
$306.1M
RCM Value Creation
$56.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$14.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$13.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Clean Claim Rate$186K$279K$372K$447K
Total$15.3M$23.0M$30.6M$36.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.8%-6.2%4.4%11.8%
P44
Net-to-Gross30.0%21.4%24.7%29.3%
P76
Occupancy70.5%56.2%66.7%71.6%
P68
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.4M$1.7M$2.1M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.3M$1.6M$1.9M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML