Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STREAMWOOD 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STREAMWOOD
CCN 144034 | IL | 178 beds | Current EBITDA $14.9M → Pro Forma $18.0M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$58.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$713K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$37K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$32K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$180K$533K$713K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$37K$37K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$293K$586K$879K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$290K$580K$870K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$238K$475K$713K$713K$713K$713K$713K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K$37K
Cumulative$0$839K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.9M$14.9M25.4%
Year 1$15.3M+$2.1M$17.4M29.7%
Year 2$15.8M+$3.1M$18.9M32.2%
Year 3$16.3M+$3.1M$19.3M33.0%
Year 4$16.8M+$3.1M$19.8M33.9%
Year 5$17.3M+$3.1M$20.3M34.7%
$148.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$223.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$74.9M
Value Created
$20.3M
Exit EBITDA
$23.7M
Organic Growth
$30.8M
RCM Value Creation
$20.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$586K$879K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$580K$870K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$356K$535K$713K$855K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$37K$45K
Total$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.4%-20.8%-7.6%3.3%
P95
Net-to-Gross78.5%20.8%24.8%32.8%
P98
Occupancy68.9%42.5%56.5%70.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$329K$695K$1.2M$1.6M
P8
Exp/Bed$245K$726K$1.2M$1.7M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML