Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROCHELLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROCHELLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 141312 | IL | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 141312

ROCHELLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$50.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$964K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$998K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$613K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$970K$28K$998K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$155K$459K$613K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$252K$504K$756K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$249K$499K$748K$998K$998K$998K$998K
A/R Days Reduction$0$204K$409K$613K$613K$613K$613K$613K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$722K$1.4M$2.1M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x
9.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x
10.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
11.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
12.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M4.2%
Year 1$2.2M+$1.8M$3.9M7.8%
Year 2$2.2M+$2.7M$4.9M9.7%
Year 3$2.3M+$2.7M$5.0M9.8%
Year 4$2.4M+$2.7M$5.0M10.0%
Year 5$2.4M+$2.7M$5.1M10.1%
$21.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$56.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.0M
Value Created
$5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$26.5M
RCM Value Creation
$5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$504K$756K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$499K$748K$998K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$307K$460K$613K$736K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.2%-6.1%-0.8%7.3%
P67
Net-to-Gross48.9%35.8%44.1%49.2%
P72
Occupancy18.9%17.2%23.9%36.9%
P28
Rev/Bed$3.0M$1.1M$1.6M$2.3M
P90
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML