Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL
CCN 140288 | IL | 293 beds | Current EBITDA $53.4M → Pro Forma $76.5M (+$23.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$439.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$53.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$76.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$23.1M
Modeled Uplift
$16.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.3M (vs $23.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$281K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.8M$8.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.5M$242K$8.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$4.0M$5.3M$16.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$281K$281K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$141K$281K$281K$281K$281K$281K$281K
Cumulative$0$6.3M$12.6M$18.7M$23.1M$23.1M$23.1M$23.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$53.4M$53.4M12.2%
Year 1$55.0M+$15.4M$70.4M16.0%
Year 2$56.6M+$23.1M$79.8M18.2%
Year 3$58.3M+$23.1M$81.5M18.5%
Year 4$60.1M+$23.1M$83.2M18.9%
Year 5$61.9M+$23.1M$85.0M19.4%
$533.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$935.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$401.2M
Value Created
$85.0M
Exit EBITDA
$85.0M
Organic Growth
$231.1M
RCM Value Creation
$85.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$141K$211K$281K$337K
Total$11.6M$17.3M$23.1M$27.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.2%-14.5%-6.9%6.0%
P82
Net-to-Gross28.1%20.9%24.8%30.8%
P66
Occupancy71.9%51.9%65.8%71.9%
P74
Rev/Bed$1.5M$862K$1.4M$1.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.3M$936K$1.4M$1.8M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML