Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EDWARD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EDWARD HOSPITAL
CCN 140231 | IL | 294 beds | Current EBITDA $33.2M → Pro Forma $53.4M (+$20.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$384.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$53.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$20.2M
Modeled Uplift
$14.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.9M (vs $20.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$246K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$212K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$246K$246K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$123K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K$246K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.4M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M$20.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x
9.0x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
11.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.2M$33.2M8.6%
Year 1$34.2M+$13.5M$47.7M12.4%
Year 2$35.2M+$20.2M$55.5M14.4%
Year 3$36.3M+$20.2M$56.5M14.7%
Year 4$37.3M+$20.2M$57.6M15.0%
Year 5$38.5M+$20.2M$58.7M15.3%
$331.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$645.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$314.1M
Value Created
$58.7M
Exit EBITDA
$52.8M
Organic Growth
$202.5M
RCM Value Creation
$58.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$123K$185K$246K$296K
Total$10.1M$15.2M$20.2M$24.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.6%-14.5%-6.9%6.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross17.8%20.9%24.8%30.8%
P9
Occupancy88.4%51.9%65.8%71.9%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.3M$862K$1.4M$1.8M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.2M$936K$1.4M$1.8M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML