Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CONDELL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140202 | IL | 257 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $21.3M (+$19.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$367.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$19.3M
Modeled Uplift
$13.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.5M (vs $19.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$235K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.1M$202K$7.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.5M$14.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$235K$235K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$118K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.5M$15.7M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x137% / 75.5x143% / 84.2x148% / 93.0x150% / 97.3x152% / 101.7x
9.0x132% / 66.7x137% / 74.5x142% / 82.3x144% / 86.2x146% / 90.1x
10.0x127% / 59.7x132% / 66.7x136% / 73.7x139% / 77.2x141% / 80.7x
11.0x122% / 54.0x127% / 60.4x132% / 66.7x134% / 69.9x136% / 73.1x
12.0x118% / 49.2x123% / 55.1x127% / 60.9x130% / 63.8x132% / 66.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.7x
Headroom (turns)
88%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 88% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.8x, adding 7.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M0.5%
Year 1$2.1M+$12.9M$15.0M4.1%
Year 2$2.1M+$19.3M$21.5M5.8%
Year 3$2.2M+$19.3M$21.5M5.9%
Year 4$2.3M+$19.3M$21.6M5.9%
Year 5$2.3M+$19.3M$21.7M5.9%
$20.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$238.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$218.0M
Value Created
$21.7M
Exit EBITDA
$3.2M
Organic Growth
$193.2M
RCM Value Creation
$21.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.5M$7.3M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$118K$176K$235K$282K
Total$9.7M$14.5M$19.3M$23.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-18.9%-7.8%3.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross22.9%20.6%24.3%31.5%
P43
Occupancy67.6%50.1%59.7%72.0%
P57
Rev/Bed$1.4M$830K$1.3M$1.7M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.4M$873K$1.3M$1.7M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML