Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVOCATE NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 140182 | IL | 233 beds | Current EBITDA $132.0M → Pro Forma $169.5M (+$37.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$713.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$132.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$169.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$37.5M
Modeled Uplift
$26.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $26.5M (vs $37.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$456K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.3M$14.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.7M$392K$14.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.5M$8.7M$27.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$456K$456K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.6M$7.1M$10.7M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.8M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$228K$456K$456K$456K$456K$456K$456K
Cumulative$0$10.2M$20.4M$30.4M$37.5M$37.5M$37.5M$37.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$132.0M$132.0M18.5%
Year 1$135.9M+$25.0M$160.9M22.6%
Year 2$140.0M+$37.5M$177.5M24.9%
Year 3$144.2M+$37.5M$181.7M25.5%
Year 4$148.5M+$37.5M$186.0M26.1%
Year 5$153.0M+$37.5M$190.5M26.7%
$1.32B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.10B
Exit EV (11x)
$775.9M
Value Created
$190.5M
Exit EBITDA
$210.2M
Organic Growth
$375.2M
RCM Value Creation
$190.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.1M$10.7M$14.3M$17.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Clean Claim Rate$228K$342K$456K$548K
Total$18.8M$28.1M$37.5M$45.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.5%-20.8%-8.7%0.8%
P92
Net-to-Gross31.5%20.6%24.8%31.5%
P75
Occupancy61.2%49.2%59.4%71.9%
P53
Rev/Bed$3.1M$711K$1.2M$1.6M
P95
Exp/Bed$2.5M$765K$1.3M$1.7M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML