Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRESENCE MERCY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRESENCE MERCY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140174 | IL | 190 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $12.1M (+$9.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$177.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$9.3M
Modeled Uplift
$5.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.9M (vs $9.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$113K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.4M$98K$3.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$544K$1.6M$2.2M$6.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$113K$113K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$887K$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$878K$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$719K$1.4M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$57K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.1M$7.6M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x98% / 30.3x102% / 34.0x107% / 37.7x109% / 39.6x111% / 41.4x
9.0x93% / 26.5x97% / 29.9x101% / 33.2x103% / 34.8x105% / 36.5x
10.0x88% / 23.6x93% / 26.5x97% / 29.5x99% / 31.0x101% / 32.5x
11.0x84% / 21.1x89% / 23.8x93% / 26.5x95% / 27.9x96% / 29.2x
12.0x80% / 19.1x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.6x
Headroom (turns)
71%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 71% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.9x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M1.5%
Year 1$2.8M+$6.2M$9.0M5.1%
Year 2$2.9M+$9.3M$12.2M6.9%
Year 3$3.0M+$9.3M$12.3M6.9%
Year 4$3.1M+$9.3M$12.4M7.0%
Year 5$3.2M+$9.3M$12.5M7.0%
$27.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$110.1M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$93.3M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$57K$85K$113K$136K
Total$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.5%-20.8%-8.0%2.7%
P72
Net-to-Gross18.0%20.8%25.3%32.7%
P14
Occupancy34.4%42.7%58.1%70.5%
P13
Rev/Bed$933K$692K$1.2M$1.6M
P37
Exp/Bed$919K$729K$1.2M$1.7M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML