Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CARBONDALE 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CARBONDALE
CCN 140164 | IL | 175 beds | Current EBITDA $52.1M → Pro Forma $70.9M (+$18.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$357.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$52.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$70.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$18.8M
Modeled Uplift
$13.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.1M (vs $18.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$229K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$196K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.3M$13.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$229K$229K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$114K$229K$229K$229K$229K$229K$229K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$52.1M$52.1M14.6%
Year 1$53.7M+$12.5M$66.2M18.5%
Year 2$55.3M+$18.8M$74.1M20.7%
Year 3$56.9M+$18.8M$75.7M21.2%
Year 4$58.6M+$18.8M$77.4M21.7%
Year 5$60.4M+$18.8M$79.2M22.2%
$520.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$871.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$350.1M
Value Created
$79.2M
Exit EBITDA
$83.0M
Organic Growth
$187.9M
RCM Value Creation
$79.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$114K$171K$229K$274K
Total$9.4M$14.1M$18.8M$22.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.6%-20.8%-7.6%3.3%
P87
Net-to-Gross28.0%20.8%24.8%32.8%
P62
Occupancy59.2%42.5%56.5%70.3%
P56
Rev/Bed$2.0M$695K$1.2M$1.6M
P86
Exp/Bed$1.7M$726K$1.2M$1.7M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML