Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FHN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FHN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140160 | IL | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $13.2M (+$7.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$149.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$96K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$458K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$96K$96K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$747K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$739K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$606K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 16.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.4x
9.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x
10.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x
11.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
12.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
47%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 47% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M3.6%
Year 1$5.5M+$5.2M$10.7M7.2%
Year 2$5.7M+$7.9M$13.5M9.0%
Year 3$5.8M+$7.9M$13.7M9.2%
Year 4$6.0M+$7.9M$13.9M9.3%
Year 5$6.2M+$7.9M$14.0M9.4%
$53.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$154.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$101.1M
Value Created
$14.0M
Exit EBITDA
$8.5M
Organic Growth
$78.6M
RCM Value Creation
$14.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$909K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$72K$96K$115K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.6%-21.6%-7.6%5.9%
P71
Net-to-Gross23.7%21.2%25.9%37.7%
P38
Occupancy38.9%35.1%51.9%70.1%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.5M$552K$933K$1.6M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.4M$519K$1.0M$1.7M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML