Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RICHLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 140147 | IL | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $-27.2M → Pro Forma $-24.7M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-27.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-24.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$877K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$929K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$919K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$565K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$929K$929K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$894K$26K$919K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$142K$423K$565K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$232K$464K$696K$929K$929K$929K$929K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$230K$460K$689K$919K$919K$919K$919K
A/R Days Reduction$0$188K$377K$565K$565K$565K$565K$565K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$665K$1.3M$2.0M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-27.2M$-27.2M-58.5%
Year 1$-28.0M+$1.6M$-26.3M-56.7%
Year 2$-28.8M+$2.4M$-26.4M-56.8%
Year 3$-29.7M+$2.4M$-27.2M-58.6%
Year 4$-30.6M+$2.4M$-28.1M-60.6%
Year 5$-31.5M+$2.4M$-29.0M-62.5%
$-271.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-319.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-47.9M
Value Created
$-29.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-43.2M
Organic Growth
$24.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-29.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$464K$696K$929K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$460K$689K$919K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$282K$424K$565K$678K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.3%-2.6%11.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross24.0%29.7%38.0%48.7%
P15
Occupancy29.1%20.1%31.9%44.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$988K$892K$1.4M$1.9M
P29
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.4M$1.9M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML