Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OTTAWA REGIONAL HOSPITAL & HEALTHCAR 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OTTAWA REGIONAL HOSPITAL & HEALTHCAR
CCN 140110 | IL | 97 beds | Current EBITDA $26.8M → Pro Forma $34.5M (+$7.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$147.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.7M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$94K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$81K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$451K$1.3M$1.8M$5.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$94K$94K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$735K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$728K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$597K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$47K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.8M$26.8M18.2%
Year 1$27.6M+$5.2M$32.7M22.3%
Year 2$28.4M+$7.7M$36.1M24.6%
Year 3$29.3M+$7.7M$37.0M25.2%
Year 4$30.1M+$7.7M$37.9M25.8%
Year 5$31.0M+$7.7M$38.8M26.4%
$267.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$426.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$158.8M
Value Created
$38.8M
Exit EBITDA
$42.6M
Organic Growth
$77.4M
RCM Value Creation
$38.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$895K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$47K$71K$94K$113K
Total$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.2%-21.8%-7.8%5.1%
P86
Net-to-Gross30.5%21.2%25.9%36.7%
P58
Occupancy40.8%35.0%51.9%69.7%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.5M$565K$938K$1.6M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.2M$532K$1.1M$1.7M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML