Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL
CCN 140091 | IL | 433 beds | Current EBITDA $144.3M → Pro Forma $208.6M (+$64.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.22B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$144.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$64.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$208.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$46.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$64.3M
Modeled Uplift
$47.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $47.5M (vs $64.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$24.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$783K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$64.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.5M$24.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.5M$673K$24.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.8M$11.1M$14.9M$46.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$783K$783K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.3M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.1M$12.1M$18.2M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.0M$9.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M$14.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$391K$783K$783K$783K$783K$783K$783K
Cumulative$0$17.5M$35.0M$52.2M$64.3M$64.3M$64.3M$64.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $64.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$144.3M$144.3M11.8%
Year 1$148.6M+$42.9M$191.5M15.7%
Year 2$153.1M+$64.3M$217.4M17.8%
Year 3$157.7M+$64.3M$222.0M18.2%
Year 4$162.4M+$64.3M$226.7M18.5%
Year 5$167.3M+$64.3M$231.6M18.9%
$1.44B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.55B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.10B
Value Created
$231.6M
Exit EBITDA
$229.8M
Organic Growth
$643.4M
RCM Value Creation
$231.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.2M$18.3M$24.5M$29.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.1M$18.2M$24.2M$29.1M
A/R Days Reduction$7.4M$11.2M$14.9M$17.9M
Clean Claim Rate$391K$587K$783K$939K
Total$32.2M$48.3M$64.3M$77.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.8%-13.6%-6.7%3.2%
P86
Net-to-Gross24.3%21.1%24.9%29.4%
P45
Occupancy85.9%58.1%69.8%81.4%
P82
Rev/Bed$2.8M$1.3M$1.5M$2.2M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.5M$1.3M$1.6M$2.4M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML