Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VISTA MEDICAL CENTER - EAST 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VISTA MEDICAL CENTER - EAST
CCN 140084 | IL | 190 beds | Current EBITDA $-30.7M → Pro Forma $-23.3M (+$7.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$139.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-30.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-23.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$7.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$89K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$77K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$428K$1.3M$1.7M$5.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$89K$89K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$697K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$691K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$566K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$45K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-30.7M$-30.7M-22.0%
Year 1$-31.6M+$4.9M$-26.7M-19.1%
Year 2$-32.5M+$7.3M$-25.2M-18.1%
Year 3$-33.5M+$7.3M$-26.2M-18.8%
Year 4$-34.5M+$7.3M$-27.2M-19.5%
Year 5$-35.6M+$7.3M$-28.2M-20.2%
$-306.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-310.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.7M
Value Created
$-28.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-48.9M
Organic Growth
$73.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-28.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$849K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$45K$67K$89K$107K
Total$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.0%-20.8%-8.0%2.7%
P22
Net-to-Gross12.9%20.8%25.3%32.7%
P0
Occupancy49.6%42.7%58.1%70.5%
P31
Rev/Bed$734K$692K$1.2M$1.6M
P29
Exp/Bed$896K$729K$1.2M$1.7M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML