Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 130066 | ID | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $4.5M → Pro Forma $10.8M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$120.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.1M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$369K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$601K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$595K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$488K$976K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.5x78% / 17.6x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.8x
9.0x68% / 13.4x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.1x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
11.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.5M$4.5M3.7%
Year 1$4.6M+$4.2M$8.8M7.4%
Year 2$4.8M+$6.3M$11.1M9.2%
Year 3$4.9M+$6.3M$11.2M9.3%
Year 4$5.1M+$6.3M$11.4M9.5%
Year 5$5.2M+$6.3M$11.5M9.6%
$44.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$126.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$82.0M
Value Created
$11.5M
Exit EBITDA
$7.2M
Organic Growth
$63.3M
RCM Value Creation
$11.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$732K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$58K$77K$92K
Total$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-6.6%-2.6%2.6%
P75
Net-to-Gross30.1%49.1%58.8%63.2%
P0
Occupancy19.7%19.7%31.6%51.8%
P25
Rev/Bed$3.8M$917K$1.6M$2.7M
P82
Exp/Bed$3.6M$1.0M$1.7M$2.6M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML