Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN IDAHO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTE 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EASTERN IDAHO REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTE
CCN 130018 | ID | 233 beds | Current EBITDA $155.6M → Pro Forma $175.1M (+$19.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$370.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$155.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$175.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$19.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.6M (vs $19.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$237K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.1M$204K$7.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$237K$237K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$237K$237K$237K$237K$237K$237K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.8M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-16%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -16% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 0.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$155.6M$155.6M42.0%
Year 1$160.2M+$13.0M$173.2M46.8%
Year 2$165.0M+$19.5M$184.5M49.8%
Year 3$170.0M+$19.5M$189.5M51.1%
Year 4$175.1M+$19.5M$194.6M52.5%
Year 5$180.3M+$19.5M$199.8M53.9%
$1.56B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.20B
Exit EV (11x)
$642.5M
Value Created
$199.8M
Exit EBITDA
$247.8M
Organic Growth
$194.9M
RCM Value Creation
$199.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$178K$237K$285K
Total$9.7M$14.6M$19.5M$23.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1771 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin42.0%-13.7%-3.8%5.9%
P99
Net-to-Gross21.6%18.5%25.8%34.2%
P35
Occupancy63.3%53.2%65.8%76.8%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.6M$878K$1.4M$1.9M
P63
Exp/Bed$923K$866K$1.4M$1.9M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML