Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA GREENLEAF HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ACADIA GREENLEAF HOSPITAL
CCN 114036 | GA | 113 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$374K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$542K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$537K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$330K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$542K$542K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$522K$15K$537K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$83K$247K$330K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$136K$271K$407K$542K$542K$542K$542K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$134K$268K$402K$537K$537K$537K$537K
A/R Days Reduction$0$110K$220K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$388K$777K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M18.1%
Year 1$5.0M+$951K$6.0M22.1%
Year 2$5.2M+$1.4M$6.6M24.4%
Year 3$5.3M+$1.4M$6.8M25.0%
Year 4$5.5M+$1.4M$6.9M25.6%
Year 5$5.7M+$1.4M$7.1M26.2%
$48.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$78.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.2M
Value Created
$7.1M
Exit EBITDA
$7.8M
Organic Growth
$14.3M
RCM Value Creation
$7.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$271K$407K$542K$650K
Denial Rate Reductio$268K$402K$537K$644K
A/R Days Reduction$165K$247K$330K$396K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$713K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.1%-11.5%-0.9%7.0%
P81
Net-to-Gross38.1%16.6%24.8%31.5%
P85
Occupancy92.0%63.4%75.2%85.0%
P86
Rev/Bed$240K$554K$1.3M$1.7M
P13
Exp/Bed$197K$600K$1.3M$1.8M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML